Assessing Collaborative Efforts

The growth of structured collaboration and group learning within distance education has contributed to student engagement and brought new challenges for educators. As Dr. Siemens stated in the course video, “The challenge is: How do we change an assessment model based on individual learning to a model based on collaborative learning?” (Laureate, 2008). As the transition is occurring between an individual learning model and a collaborative learning community there are several assessment options to consider. Instead of looking at assessment as a separate component to teaching or learning it is more appropriate to view each component as an interdependent piece of the education process. Assessment, learning objectives, and instructional strategies must all be aligned to achieve the highest degree of success. If collaboration and group work is part of the learning objectives then they must also be included in assessment. Some of the possible options for assessment in an online learning environment include peer assessment, providing opportunities for participation in online communities where students receive direct feedback, assessment based on the value of student contribution, and assessment based on computer collected data (Laureate, 2008).  To provide the most comprehensive assessment more than one strategy should be used.

Another important consideration for developing the assessment component of an online program is whether the assessment is fair and equitable. “Assessment should be: fair and direct, based on stated outcomes, and equitable” (Laureate, 2008). It is also worth considering the weight placed on specific levels of achievement vs. student growth. There must be balance between these two aspects to create an accurate, fair, and equitable assessment component.

In addition to these considerations an educator should also consider the unique and individual characteristics of the students who will be enrolling in this program. Each student learns best in different ways and even has what Howard Gardner identifies as multiple intelligences. Students who are strong in the interpersonal intelligence will naturally do well in collaborative and group work. Those who are weak may struggle in this area. In order to meet the needs of these students it will be necessary to differentiate both instruction and assessment. Educators must also consider student growth as well as provide clear and measurable goals for student collaboration.  When these steps are taken students who may struggle with working in groups will have the best chance for success within the distance program.

Reference

Gardner, H. E. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Int. Perseus Books Group.

Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Principles of distance education: Assessment of collaborative learning. Baltimore, MD: Author.