The debate over which learning theory is the most accurate seems
to spark strong responses among educators. Most educators have strong opinions
regarding which educational theory most accurately describes learning. However,
many contemporary educators would rather not be labeled as a strict proponent of
any single theory. In his blog
Karl Kapp offers an explanation for this sentiment. In his post titled, “Out
and About: Discussion on Educational Schools of Thought” he states, “We need to
take pieces from each school of thought and apply it effectively
because…Cognitivism doesn’t explain 100% how humans process information and
neither does Constructivism or Behaviorism.”
As a classroom educator I have seen situations where
behaviorism offers the best explanation for the link between student reward and
student action. There are also more complex situations where cognitivism is the
most appropriate theory. In conclusion the more appropriate and productive
discussion would focus on classifying the learning situations which can best
illustrate the various learning theories.
References
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
